THE PUNDITS · THE TV PUNDIT

Jim Cramer

@jimcramer · 2,513,293 followers on X · The original inverse indicator. Now with crypto takes.

Every crypto call Jim Cramer posted on X since Jan 1, 2026, turned into a virtual $10,000 portfolio. Following them made −11.1%; doing the exact opposite made +7.3%. Over the same days Bitcoin went −7.2%, so following Jim Cramer trailed just holding it. They were right on 8 of 17 calls (47%) 7 days later.

FOLLOW−11.1%$10,000 → $8,895
FADE+7.3%$10,000 → $10,726
CALLS2517 of them scored
$8k$10k$12kJan 1Oct 29
-- Doing the opposite— Just holding Bitcoin
XWHATSAPP
A CALL OF THEIRS

On Feb 2, 2026

“The demonstration of what can happen in a weekend with bitcoin demonstrates its unreliability, on a short-term basis, to be a currency...And i write that as someone who owns…”— Jim Cramer on X

▲ Bullish on $BTC. 7 days later it had moved −10.8%. See the post ↗

THEIR COINS

What Jim Cramer talks about

COINCALLS▲ · ▼FIRSTLATEST
$BTC244 · 12Jan 21, 2026Jun 10, 2026 ↗
$NEAR11 · 0Apr 5, 2026Apr 5, 2026 ↗

▲ bullish · ▼ bearish; the rest just mention it. ↗ opens their latest call on X.

THE LEAGUE TABLE

How Jim Cramer compares

PUNDITFOLLOWFADERIGHTCALLS
1Ansem@blknoiz06+60.6%−62.9%52% of 499547
2Raoul Pal@RaoulGMI+21.9%−63.5%54% of 2630
3Elon Musk@elonmusk+3.3%−3.9%—2
4Cathie Wood@CathieDWood−2.0%−5.5%43% of 78
5Peter Schiff@PeterSchiff−7.7%−8.4%51% of 197217
6Jim Cramer@jimcramer−11.1%+7.3%47% of 1725
7Michael Saylor@saylor−12.8%−1.5%46% of 256292
8Arthur Hayes@CryptoHayes−68.4%−3.1%46% of 81106

The pundits vs ordinary men and women →

How it works: every original post a pundit makes on X since Jan 1, 2026 is read by AI for coin calls, the same way as the men vs women panel's. A bullish call buys the coin in a virtual $10,000 portfolio and a bearish one sells it; "fade" does the exact opposite. A call is right if the coin moved its way 7 days later. Virtual money, no fees. Not financial advice.